e-Ariana - Todays Afghan News
 Home 
 News 
 Articles 
 Cartoons 
 Feedback 
 Opinion  
 Contact Us  
 An Ariana Media Publication 05/19/2013
 Top planners' input not asked for on Afghan "zero option": source

Reuters
01/17/2013
By Adrian Croft

[Printer Friendly Version]

BRUSSELS - Top military planners on the NATO-led mission in Afghanistan were not asked to give their views on the possibility of all U.S. troops being pulled out of the country after 2014, a senior NATO officer said on Thursday.

The fact that top planners have not been asked for input suggests the so-called "zero option" might not be being looked at seriously by U.S. President Barack Obama's administration.

Analysts have said that the U.S. administration may have floated the idea as a tactic to put pressure on Afghan President Hamid Karzai while the two sides negotiate over the future U.S. military presence in Afghanistan, including issues such as whether foreign soldiers would be immune from prosecution.

"We have not been asked to or been required to provide a conversation (advice) with respect to the zero option," the NATO officer said, briefing reporters on condition of anonymity.

Asked about the "zero option" last week, U.S. Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes said it was "an option that we would consider", contradicting the long-held expectation that thousands would remain to train and advise Afghan forces.

Alarmed Afghan lawmakers said disaster and civil war would follow if Washington pulled out all of its troops.

There are some 66,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan. The U.S. and other foreign forces there are gradually reducing their troops as Afghan forces take charge of the nation's security.

General John Allen, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, has suggested keeping between 6,000 and 15,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan after 2014, according to U.S. officials.

The White House has asked recently also for options to be developed for keeping a lower range of troops, between 3,000 and 9,000, in the country, officials said.

The senior NATO officer said on Thursday he expected firm numbers on the size of the post-2014 mission in Afghanistan to emerge "within a couple of months" and that many of the numbers quoted by media "have not been accurately reported".

"It is less about a particular number than it is about how well that mission can be executed at a particular number," the officer said.

The United States expects other NATO allies to contribute in addition between a third and a half of the number of troops that Washington decides to leave in Afghanistan after 2014, he said.

"In the post-2014 period, whatever the U.S. number is, add a third of that or a half to that," he said.

The number of bases that the post-2014 force will operate from would be cut back sharply, the officer said.

"(We) have about 226 bases remaining in Afghanistan that we have to close over the remaining 23 months and that number varies because we are closing bases every day - as fast as we can actually," the officer said.

The post-2014 force would be likely to operate out of Bagram airfield near Kabul, retain offices in the Afghan capital, and have staff at the Afghan military training centers, he said.

Depending on the size of the force, it could have advisers in key Afghan regions or could employ mobile training teams, going from one Afghan regional headquarters to another, he said.

(Editing by Louise Ireland)

Back to Top



Other Stories:


The socio economic effects of American withdrawal
Khama Press (04/11/2013)

US troops open fire on civilian bus in Herat, 2 killed or injured
Khama Press (04/11/2013)

Uzbek fighters gain support in Afghan north
Al Jazeera (04/11/2013)

Pakistan army tries to win over local population in war-torn tribal region
The Associated Press (04/11/2013)

Afghanistan, the drug addiction capital
BBC (04/11/2013)

Man With Ties to Karzai Dies in a Military Raid
The New York Times (04/11/2013)

Plot to blow up dam hatched in Quetta: NDS
Pajhwok (04/01/2013)

Russia may set up new Afghanistan bases – official
RT, Russia (03/30/2013)

US hands control to Afghan commandos in strategic district outside Kabul
The Associated Press (03/30/2013)

Civilians among 16 killed in Ghazni airstrike
Pajhwok (03/30/2013)

Pakistan terms for Afghan peace talks unacceptable: Faizi
Khaama Press (03/30/2013)

Pakistan denies asking Afghanistan to snap ties with India
The Hindu (03/30/2013)

U.S. Tests a Risky Route for Shipping Gear Out of Afghanistan
The Wall Street Journal (03/30/2013)

How Afghanistan is Beginning to Deal with Workplace Sexual Harassment
TIME (03/30/2013)

An Eternal Return in Afghanistan?
World Policy Journal (03/30/2013)

Russia seeks role in Afghanistan stability after NATO pullout
Khaama Press (03/30/2013)

Afghanistan accuses Pakistan of wrecking peace hopes
NBC News (03/30/2013)

Teenage cycling prodigy leads Afghan women to new freedoms
NBC News (03/30/2013)

Hamid Karzai, confused by the U.S.
The Washington Post (03/30/2013)

U.S. must decide about troops in Afghanistan
The Washington Post (03/30/2013)

In Afghan Child Abuse Cases, Victims Go to Jail
IWPR (03/27/2013)

From Kabul love affair to Afghanistan's first centre for study of its history
The Guardian (03/27/2013)

Quorum problem hits Wolesi Jirga business
Pajhwok (03/27/2013)

How Britain betrayed female Afghan boxers
Morning Star (03/22/2013)

Suicide vest explosion kills 5, injures 6 in Helmand
Khama Press (03/21/2013)

3 Men Beheaded in Kandahar
Tolo (03/21/2013)

Living conditions for Afghan refugees in Iran are decreasing
ReliefWeb (03/21/2013)

US lawmakers call Karzai a wrong choice
Pajhwok (03/21/2013)

How the Taliban wins over Afghans without firing a shot
Global Post (03/21/2013)

Surprising hope for Pakistan and Afghanistan
CNN (03/21/2013)


Back to Top