| | Survivors of family killed in Afghanistan raid threaten suicide attacks The Times, UK
03/16/2010
By Jerome Starkey in Afghanistan
[Printer Friendly Version]
A family whose members were killed in a botched night raid in eastern Afghanistan have rejected “blood money” from the Government and vowed to carry out suicide attacks unless the perpetrators are brought to justice.
Two pregnant women, a teenage girl, a policeman and his brother were shot dead on February 12 by unidentified gunmen. Eight men were arrested in the raid on the village of Khataba in Paktia province. They have all been released.
No one has claimed responsibility for the killings. A US official in Kabul refused to identify the force involved, citing “utmost national and strategic security interests”.
The United Nations has criticised intelligence agencies in Afghanistan in the past for using paramilitary groups to carry out “extrajudicial killings”. If the force was controlled by the CIA or Afghanistan’s domestic intelligence service it would be exempt from new Nato guidelines designed to limit night raids, which came into force on January 23.
Local elders delivered $2,000 (£1,300) in compensation for each of the five victims to the head of the family, Haji Sharabuddin, after protests brought Gardez, the capital of Paktia, to a halt. “I don’t want money. I want justice,” he said. “All our family, we now don’t care about our lives. We will all do suicide attacks and [the whole province] will support us.”
Nato had claimed that the assault force found the women’s bodies “tied up, gagged and killed”. In its initial statement it also said: “Several insurgents engaged the joint force in a fire fight and were killed.”
An investigation by The Times at and around the scene found both those statements to be untrue. Although the family’s claims that they did not shoot back could not be independently verified, none of the dead was an insurgent. Relatives say that the women were killed during, not before, the raid.
Nato officials continued to brief journalists in Kabul yesterday that the women were victims of an “honour” killing. However, they did not explain why the bodies would have been kept in the house overnight, against Islamic custom, nor why the family had invited 25 guests to celebrate the naming of a newborn child the same evening. Nato denies accusations of a cover-up.
An undated document seen by The Times that was presented by US forces to Commander Dawood, the dead policeman, praised him for his work and “dedication and willingness to serve the people of Afghanistan”. It said he would “ensure the stability of your country for many years”.
Commander Dawood’s brother, Saranwal Zahir, was a district attorney in Ahmadabad district, also in Paktia. The two married women were four and five months pregnant. The teenage girl, Gulalai, was engaged to be married this summer.
“Before, when I heard reports of raids like this and elders said [foreign troops] only came to colonise Afghanistan, I told them they are here to help us,” said Sayed Mohammed Mal, the vice-chancellor of Gardez University, whose son Mansoor was Gulalai’s fiancé. “But when I witnessed this in my family’s home, I realised I was wrong. Now I accept the things those people told me. I hate [foreign forces]. I hate the Government.”
Afghan officials insist that the raid was a mistake. None of the people reached by The Times said that the family had links with the Taleban.
“My father was friends with the Americans and they killed him.,” said Commander Dawood’s son, Abdul Ghafar, as he held a dog-eared photograph showing the policeman with three US soldiers. One of the Americans had his arm around Mr Dawood. “They killed my father. I want to kill them. I want the killers brought to justice.”
The family suspect that a spy may have deliberately misled the assault force and the relatives have appealed to President Karzai to hand him over.
“If the Government don’t give us the spy I will carry a holy Koran to the presidential palace and ask, why don’t you help us? Why do you let the Americans carry out these operations?” Mr Dawood’s mother, Bibi Sabsparie, said. Haji Sharabuddin, her husband, said that he wanted the spy shot, hanged and burnt.
“The foreigners are always talking about human rights. But they don’t care about human rights,” said Gulalai’s father, Mohammed Tahir. “They teach us human rights then they kill a load of civilians. They didn’t come here to end terrorism. They are terrorists.”
Mohammed Sabir, whose wife, Bibi Shirin, was killed, suggested vengeance: “If the Americans don’t give us the spy, bring us seven Americans and we will kill them.”
The family count seven deaths, not five, because the two women were pregnant.
-------------
Your Comments
w carr wrote:
There seem to be death squads outside the control of NATO commanders, who do as they like and actually kill the allies of NATO. How crazy is that? These groups should be disbanded immediatela and brought to account. The CIA has a long history of this kind of activity, and incompetence.
This is a terrible thing for the families and I feel for them but I hope they will not carry out their threats as that would no doubt lead to deaths of more innocent people
March 15, 2010 8:19 AM GMT on community.timesonline.co.uk Recommend? (8) Report Abuse
Permalink
Andrew Ervin wrote:
I have been a supporter of the campaign in Afghanistan since the beginning, however, as of late I have begun to question the overall strategy in this war.
March 15, 2010 7:24 AM GMT on community.timesonline.co.uk Recommend? (8) Report Abuse
Permalink
john marsh wrote:
more NATO lies and bull
March 15, 2010 6:32 AM GMT on community.timesonline.co.uk Recommend? (17) Report Abuse
Permalink
john marsh wrote:
I entirely agree with the family members! The articles of the Geneva convention not only give the legal right for these family members to take up arms and assassinate these war criminals they call it a duty to attack these war criminals to prevent further war crimes. Afghanistan and the USA are signatories to the conventions therefore the Afgan people effected by these war crimes have a duty to respond in kind and cannot be classed as terrorists or insurgents the law is the law!.
March 15, 2010 6:24 AM GMT on community.timesonline.co.uk Recommend? (18) Report Abuse
Permalink
Kane Oz wrote:
'utmost national and strategic security interest'? Being what? If we admit we've killed civilians yet a-flaming-gain and initially lied about it yet a-flaming-gain to avoid admitting what is already well known - yet again - people might use this to recruit…so it isn’t in our interest to admit we killed civilians yet a-flaming-gain? At which point will the mentality of excessive spin and ‘kill as many of them for as few of us’ admit the reality that killing hundreds of civilians by drone and night-time assault is so counterproductive that Afghanistan is – yet again – turning to the Taliban! Conclusion of the only extant study of all suicide terrorism not written by someone associated with formulating US military strategy: ‘what nearly all suicide terrorist attacks have in common is a specific secular and strategic goal: to compel modern democracies to withdraw military forces from territory that the terrorists consider to be their homeland’ (Pape, 2005). And they are not insane, although some are revenging killed family members, ‘“[T]hey resemble the kind of politically conscious individuals who might join a grassroots movement more than they do wayward adolescents or religious fanatics”. Get the bleeding message already!
March 15, 2010 5:06 AM GMT on community.timesonline.co.uk Recommend? (16) Report Abuse
Permalink
Krishna Kumar wrote:
“vowed to carry out suicide attacks unless the perpetrators are brought to justice.”
If all over the world victims of Islamic terrorists take a vow like this, there will be not be many places left!
Other Stories:
|
|